Twitter Etiquette Part 2!

Greetings Readers!

I have been surprised by the reaction I have received in last post about Twitter Etiquette.  I expected to get flamed, but not quite like I did.  I have decided to write a second post in response to the reaction I have received from the first post.  I also have some new rules that were brought to my attention after the original post.  Before I introduce the additions to my list of rule for proper Twitter etiquette, I shall respond to some of the comments I received over the last story.

Before I respond to specific issues, my “rules” are not something enforceable and are not intended to be.  They are for the benefit of the Twitter users and in hopes of keeping the Twitter service stable.  Twitter doesn’t need any help to crash, excessive usage doesn’t do them any favors.  That said, it seems that many people do not understand what Twitter is.

Twitter is a micro-blogging service, NOT a chat room or instant messenger.   If you want to have large discussions, use an IRC chat, not massive @ usage.  People who don’t care about your @ conversation don’t want their feed spammed with your conversation because you are too inconsiderate to move to an actual chat room.

I have had a number of people suggest that I stop following people that I had these issues with.  I don’t like doing that because occasionally these people Twitter something I find valuable.  In the months that I have used Twitter, I have followed probably 50 different people.  I stopped following four of the top users that I was following and it cut the tweets I receive by probably 75%.  While I won’t name names, but it is people like them that flood everybody’s Twitter feeds which ruin the experience for their fellow users.  I don’t like to stop following people, but if you have an unhealthy obsession with Twitter that creates a less enjoyable user experience for me, I will stop following you.  The purpose of my list is so that people don’t create a less enjoyable experience for others.

The final point I want to address that I have received some feedback on is my thought of multiple accounts.  While nobody seems to disagree with my idea of moving automated posts to a second account, many people don’t seem to understand my idea of having different accounts for different purposes.  The purpose of having multiple accounts is that followers may care about some things you post, but not everything.  By having an account for multiple things, you can have happy followers that care about that particular topic but don’t want to be inundated with messages that you post about other topics.  I will give you an example.  Say somebody hosts a large number of podcasts or blogs about several different topics.  If I enjoy some podcasts or blogs but don’t care about others, I don’t want updates about the stuff I don’t care about.  Having to sort through the posts I don’t care about to get to those that I do is both inconvenient and frustrating from a user experience standpoint.  Having choices is always better than being forced to take everything.

Now that my response to reader comments is over, I want to introduce a couple of new rules for proper Twitter etiquette.

  1. Messages should not be split up over multiple Twitter posts.  There is a reason you only have 140 characters to post in.  Like I mentioned earlier, Twitter is a micro-blogging service.  If what you have to post about takes more than one post, it should be posted in a blog.
  2. Twitter is not a chat room.  If you are having large conversations that involve multiple users, move it into an actual chat room.  There is a reason that IRC has been used for many years and is still very popular.  It is far better for a conversation than filling up peoples feed with @ messages about whatever you are discussing.
  3. Posting the exact same message multiple times should be avoided at all costs.  If you are unsure that a message went through, check your feed before you post the same thing over again.  Nobody likes to be flooded with identical posts, especially if its something they don’t care about.

I have no plans to write a third blog post on this topic unless I see it necessary as I have other topics I would like to write about.  If I feel the need to respond to a comment, I will do so in the comments section.  Before you post a comment, keep in mind that my list is to improve the user experience of the twitter users, not attack your personal usage habits.


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

11 responses to “Twitter Etiquette Part 2!”

  1. Mnemonic Device Avatar
    Mnemonic Device

    I feel a fool for falling for your joke. You are a master jokesmith, the likes of which we have not seen since Andy Kaufman.

  2. […] written a post called “Twitter Etiquette” and a follow up unexpectedly called “Twitter Etiquette Part 2.” While the first post makes a few good points as well as a few I disagree with, the second […]

  3. Carla Avatar

    If we don’t use Twitter according to your preferences, we don’t understand the true nature of Twitter?!

  4. Twitter Police Avatar

    Well said, citizen! The Twitter Police appreciate your efforts to maintain order. Be vigilant! Be aware! Beware, doers of poor etiquette! The TWITTER POLICE are on patrol!

  5. DawnPapuga.com » Blog Archive » New Media Malaise

    […] “pcnerd37” on Global Geek News Blog entitled “Twitter Etiquette,” and it’s successor, “Twitter Etiquette Part 2.” For whatever reason, Bray decided to take it upon himself to pull together what are supposed to be […]

  6. Twitter Etiquette | Global Geek News Blog

    […] There are now even more Twitter Etiquette rules!  Check out Twitter Etiquette Part 2! […]

  7. The PlayStation Network Terms of Service: Revisited! | Global Geek News Blog

    […] it is now the third most viewed post on the Global Geek News Blog behind the Twitter Etiquette and Twitter Etiquette 2 posts.  OK, here we […]

  8. Chris Avatar

    pcnerd37, I think you’ve begun a good discussion, even if you’ve been flamed for it.

    Sets of rules like the ones you’ve proposed ought to be received by the Twitter community as… well, maybe not as rules per se, but as desiderata, helpful suggestions. Or as an “opening bid,” a target for discussion. It would be nice if the flamers could offer constructive alternatives.

    Contrary to what’s been said by some of the commentators, there’s nothing remotely police-like about suggesting some rules-of-thumb. I’m not sure I agree with all of your rules, but the effort to have a discussion seems worthwhile.

  9. Travis King Avatar

    Jeremy,

    Sorry you feel the way you do, but the way Twitter’s moving, it basically has become a worldwide chatroom. And that’s great. It’s one giant conversation.

    From the viewpoint of an amateur sociologist, I think it’s great that there are so many conversations in the open. The ability to search these conversations, to “overhear” snippets of what people are talking about is one of the best things about Twitter. It gives great insight into the thoughts and feelings of those who use the service.

    From the viewpoint of a Twitter user, I feel the same way. It’s by searching the open conversations that I find people with similar interests. If everything was said with DM, people wouldn’t connect like they do and the Twitterverse would be a very boring place.

  10. Scott Avatar
    Scott

    I liked your original 7. I think that people are being dicks about this! “don’t tell me how to twitter” what a bunch of garbage.

    – @elephantattack

  11. kaila Avatar

    I LOVE the idea of different accounts for different purposes. I can keep my personal tweets and business tweets separate. I wish more people did. I’m often interested in the business that someone has with me but not that interested in what they had for breakfast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.